The Impact of Training on Enhancing Employee Efficiency at the Branches of the Social Security Fund in the Al-Jafarh Region
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.65420/cjhes.v1i2.11Keywords:
Training, Job Efficiency, Human ResourcesAbstract
Training is considered one of the main pillars for developing human efficiency in both public and private institutions. It is viewed as a strategic tool to improve institutional performance and enhance employee productivity. From this perspective, the present study aimed to examine the impact of training on the development of employee efficiency at the branches of the Social Security Fund in the Al-jafarh region. This stems from the administrative and professional challenges affecting employee performance and the need to build human capacities capable of keeping pace with the demands of modern institutional work. The study adopted the descriptive-analytical method as the most appropriate approach to measure the relationship between two variables: training and efficiency. A questionnaire was used as the primary tool for data collection and was distributed to a sample of 30 employees (male and female) working in the Fund. The data were analyzed using appropriate statistical methods, including the one-sample T-test, to test the main hypothesis stating that there is no impact of training on efficiency development at a significance level of α = 0.05.
The results showed that the majority of the study sample were male (66.7%), and most were aged between 25 and 35 years, reflecting a young workforce within the institution. Furthermore, the majority held leadership positions (66.7%) and possessed either intermediate or higher academic qualifications, indicating a good level of educational attainment that could be further enhanced through additional training. The results of the T-test revealed statistically significant differences between the sample’s average evaluation of the impact of training and the assumed value. The mean score was 2.60, falling within the range (2.34–3.00), which indicates a high level of importance. The T-value was 6.12, exceeding the critical table value, leading to the rejection of the null hypothesis and the acceptance of the alternative hypothesis.
