The effectiveness of Teaching Systemic Functional Grammar in Improving EFL Postgraduates' Academic Writing Skills, Faculty of Arts and Languages
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.65420/cjhes.v2i1.183Keywords:
Systemic Functional Grammar (SFG), academic writing skillsAbstract
The Functional Grammar Approach is a modern linguistic perspective that views language as a tool for communication rather than merely a set of formal rules. According to Halliday, language serves three main functions: the ideational function (expressing ideas and experiences), the interpersonal function (building social relationships), and the textual function (organizing messages in a coherent way). This approach represents a significant shift in linguistic studies, focusing on meaning, context, and communication, and offering a deep understanding of how language functions in everyday life. This study examined the effectiveness of the Systemic Functional Grammar (SFG) approach in enhancing academic writing skills among EFL postgraduate students. An experimental design was employed to compare 25 students’ performance in pre- and post-tests, and adopting content analysis to reveal which skills were truly improved. The results revealed a statistically significant improvement in students’ writing after the implementation of the SFG approach. Furthermore, content analysis of students’ texts showed noticeable progress in vocabulary use, organization, and cohesion. The findings also highlighted the important role of thematic structures, particularly theme and rheme, in improving coherence and textual organization. These results support the view that grammar should be taught as a functional and meaningful resource rather than a set of mere rules. Based on these findings, the study recommends integrating authentic learning environments, adopting implicit grammar teaching strategies, and promoting critical thinking to further develop students’ writing competence.
References
[1] Abdelrhman Ishag Oman Adam. (2025). The Role of English Literature in Enhancing Speaking Skills among EFL University Students. Al-Imad Journal of Humanities and Applied Sciences (AJHAS), 1(2), 32-37. https://al-imadjournal.ly/index.php/ajhas/article/view/11
[2] AlHamdany, H. (2012). The effectiveness of systemic functional linguistics in EFL classrooms. Journal of Language Teaching, 5(2), 45–60.
[3] Ali, F. M., & Bianku, S. N. (2025). The Interplay of Pronunciation, Intelligibility, and Identity: Perceptions of Libyan EFL Secondary School Students. Comprehensive Journal of Humanities and Educational Studies, 852-862. https://doi.org/10.65420/cjhes.v1i1.116
[4] Cambridge University Press. (2005). Cambridge advanced learner's dictionary..
[5] Clarence-Fincham, J. (2001). Using systemic functional grammar in the classroom. Language Education Journal, 12(3), 22–35.
[6] Cordeiro, C. (2018). Systemic functional linguistics and discourse analysis. Routledge.
[7] Correa, D., & Echeverri, S. (2017). Using grammar to improve writing skills in EFL learners. HOW Journal, 24(1), 79–98.
[8] Darong, H. (2021). Interpersonal metafunction in language use. Journal of Linguistic Studies, 8(1), 15–25.
[9] Downing, A. (2001). Thematic structure and coherence in English texts. Journal of Linguistics, 37(1), 1–25.
[10] Dr. Abdulhakim Abdullah Almanqoush. (2025). A study of learned helplessness among students of the Faculty of Education at Bani Walid University. Al-Imad Journal of Humanities and Applied Sciences (AJHAS), 1(2), 08-19. https://al-imadjournal.ly/index.php/ajhas/article/view/9
[11] Eggins, S. (2004). An introduction to systemic functional linguistics (2nd ed.). Continuum.
[12] Emilia, E. (2010). Teaching writing: Developing critical learners. Rizqi Press.
[13] Gtiesh, A. M., & Matoug, R. O. (2025). University Teaching Methods and Curricula: Reality, Challenges, and Modern Trends. Comprehensive Journal of Humanities and Educational Studies, 132-146. https://doi.org/10.65420/cjhes.v1i2.25
[14] Halliday, M. A. K. (1985). An introduction to functional grammar. Edward Arnold.
[15] Halliday, M. A. K., & Matthiessen, C. M. I. (2004). An introduction to functional grammar. Hodder Arnold.
[16] Hanh, N. T. (2021). The impact of functional grammar on EFL writing skills. Journal of Language and Education, 7(2), 55–70.
[17] Harmer, J. (2001). The practice of English language teaching (3rd ed.). Pearson Longman.
[18] Hassan, A., et al. (2021). Functional grammar and writing development in EFL contexts. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 11(3), 120–135.
[19] Herman, H., et al. (2022). Interpersonal metafunction in discourse analysis. Journal of Applied Linguistics, 9(2), 34–50.
[20] Herman, H., et al. (2023). Ideational metafunction and clause analysis. Linguistics Journal, 10(1), 11–25.
[21] Horverak, M. O. (2016). The effect of systemic functional linguistics on writing instruction. Nordic Journal of Language Teaching, 5(1), 1–15.
[22] Khazaal, E. N. (2019). Improving postgraduates’ academic writing skills with summarizing strategy. Arab World English Journal, 10(3), 413–428.
[23] Maldin, A., & Wibowo, A. (2022). The role of systemic functional grammar in improving writing skills. Journal of English Teaching, 8(1), 20–35.
[24] Maledo, R., & Edhere, O. (2021). Ideational metafunction in discourse. International Journal of Linguistics, 13(2), 66–78.
[25] Maulida, D. S., Rahman, M. A., Handrianto, C., & Rasool, S. (2022). A review of the blended learning as the model in improving student’s paragraph writing skills. Abjadia: International Journal of Education, 7(1), 59–72. https://doi.org/10.18860/abj.v7i1.15901.
[26] McCrocklin, S., & Slater, T. (2017). Using SFL for text analysis in EFL contexts. TESOL Journal, 8(3), 560–580.
[27] Nagao, A. (2019). Systemic functional linguistics and language teaching. Journal of Education and Practice, 10(5), 12–20.
[28] Numan Khazaal, E. (2019). Writing difficulties among EFL learners. International Journal of English Linguistics, 9(4), 123–133.
[29] Orafi, S. (2026). Classroom Interaction in English Language Learning: Perspectives of Libyan Secondary School Students and Teachers. Comprehensive Journal of Humanities and Educational Studies, 782-809. https://doi.org/10.65420/cjhes.v2i1.159
[30] Rosa, R. N., Zein, T. T., & Anwar, I. (2026). Theme and rheme: The contribution of thematic progression to the cohesiveness of writing discussion texts. Studies in English Language and Education, 13(1), 16–28.
[31] Sembiante, S., et al. (2021). Levels of language structure in systemic functional linguistics. Linguistics and Education, 63, Article 100925.
[32] Toba, R., et al. (2019). Grammar and writing skills in EFL contexts. Journal of English Education, 7(1), 10–20.
[33] Tshotsho, B. (2014). Theme and rheme in academic writing. Per Linguam, 30(2), 58–72.
[34] Vinchristo, J. (2022). Clause-level analysis in systemic functional linguistics. Journal of Language Research, 14(1), 40–55.
[35] Wada, M., & Wappa, P. (2020). Textual metafunction in discourse. Discourse Studies Journal, 6(2), 88–102.
[36] Wang, L. (2007). Theme and rheme in the organization of text. Asian EFL Journal, 9(1), 164–176.
[37] Zakaria, N., Hashim, H., & Zaini, N. (2024). Challenges in academic writing among postgraduate students. International Journal of Academic Research in Education, 12(1), 30–42.
[38] Zeng, D. (2005). Writing strategies in EFL learning. Asian EFL Journal, 7(2), 45.
