The Implications of US-China Strategic Competition on Global Supply Chain Stability: A Case Study of Semiconductors

Authors

  • Abuojaylah Wannees Omar General Department, Faculty of Economics and Political Science, Bani Waleed University, Libya Author
  • lmuetasim billalah Awnallah Department of Regional and International Studies, School of International and Strategic Studies, Libyan Academy, Tripoli, Libya Author
  • Tawfeik Mohamed Mohamed General Department, Faculty of Economics and Political Science, Bani Waleed University, Libya Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.65420/cjhes.v1i2.41

Keywords:

US-China relations, strategic competition, global supply chains, semiconductors, export controls, economic statecraft, decoupling, technological sovereignty

Abstract

The strategic competition between the United States and the People's Republic of China has evolved beyond traditional military and diplomatic realms into a fierce contest for technological supremacy. This paper argues that this competition fundamentally destabilizes global supply chains by politicizing their core architecture, transforming them from efficiency-driven networks into instruments of geopolitical power. Using the semiconductor industry as a critical case study, the analysis demonstrates how policies like export controls, sanctions, and onshoring initiatives create systemic fragility, bifurcate markets, and introduce significant uncertainty into the global economy. The paper employs a qualitative analysis of primary policy documents and secondary economic data to trace the causal mechanisms of this disruption. It concludes that the weaponization of interdependence in the tech sector necessitates a re-evaluation of traditional supply chain models and presents profound challenges for global economic governance.

Downloads

Published

2025-11-29

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

The Implications of US-China Strategic Competition on Global Supply Chain Stability: A Case Study of Semiconductors. (2025). Comprehensive Journal of Humanities and Educational Studies, 1(2), 335-344. https://doi.org/10.65420/cjhes.v1i2.41